Case Study – Whitaker v Rogers 1992 – An Unsightly Outcome

Longton Compensation Lawyers
No data was found

Case study: Rogers v Whitaker (1992) HCA 58 – 175 CLR 479

What would you do if a doctor offered to “fix” an injury that had plagued you since childhood, and advises that he could restore it to a condition even better than before your accident? Most of us would definitely consider it, and in 1992, Maree Whitaker took her doctor up on this exact offer, but ended up in a horrifying situation.

Medical negligence has always been a complex term in Australian law.The following case of Rogers v Whitaker (1992), set a new standard for medical negligence as the High Court introduces the ‘failure to warn’ principle.

Whitaker Sues Rogers

Following the surgery, Whitaker sued Rogers in the Supreme Court of NSW for damages caused by medical negligence. Ms Whitaker subsequently won and was awarded over $800,000. Rogers inevitably appealed to the High Court, arguing that the issue should be resolved with the application of the ‘Bolam’ Principle.

The Bolam Principle

In England, the approach to similar medical negligence problems had been determined by the Bolam rule.  The case, which inspired the ruling, was heard in the 1950s, and involved a patient who was injured whilst receiving ECT treatment without the prior administration of a relaxant drug.  This evidence lead to the Court formulating the following:

“A doctor is not negligent if he acts in accordance with a practice accepted at the time as proper by a responsible body of medical opinion even though other doctors adopt a different practice.  In short, the law imposes the duty of care:  but the standard of care is a matter of medical judgment.”  

It followed from this rule that as long as a sufficient number of medical practitioners adopted the practice in question, the practitioner sued would have a complete defence. 

However, the Bolam rule is directed towards the actual provision of treatment, whereas Rogers v Whitaker was concerned with advice about risks involved in treatment.  In cases decided after Bolam, some judges expressed the view that the rule should only apply in cases involving negligent treatment or surgery, but not where the issue was the quality of the advice or information given.  In Rogers v Whitaker the Court also decided that the rule should be restricted in that exact way.

Important Factors

Two crucial factors contributed the case of Rogers vs Whitaker.

First, Ms. Whitaker was unaware of the risks of the surgery, as Rogers had failed to state the concerns prior to the treatment.  Second, Ms. Whitaker would not have been prepared to take the risk of loss of her sight had she been informed of the risk.  In these circumstances the court found there to be no reason as to why the practitioner should not be held liable for negligence, when a simple warning could have avoided this consequence. Mr. Roger’s appeal was denied.

Conclusion

Medical negligence claims can be quite difficult to resolve, and in most instances, require the knowledge of an experienced personal injury practitioner to distil the facts and identify the legalities.

The body of law attached to Medical Negligence continues to expand incrementally with technological and procedural advances in medicine, and there will always be an inherent risk in any medical procedure. Apart from patients who need to inform themselves as much as possible before a medical procedure, Medical practitioners themselves also need to continually inform themselves of the latest and best practices for their area of expertise.

If you believe that you have suffered injury as a consequence of negligent action, or are a medical practitioner in need of advice, please contact Longton Legal for an obligation free initial consultation.

 

*Disclaimer:This is intended as general information only and not to be construed as legal advice. The above information is subject to changes over time. You should always seek professional advice before taking any course of action.*

*Disclaimer: This is intended as general information only and not to be construed as legal advice. The above information is subject to changes over time. You should always seek professional advice before taking any course of action.*

Key Contact

Share

[oacsspl]
16 reads

Further reading .

64115a5a5a485
Mother recovers significant compensati...
A small proportion of women who give birth vaginally will suffer 3rd or 4th degree tears. The risk of such tearing is increased with…
Mother recovers significant compensation for instrumental vaginal delivery injuries
655becd5e5418
What can you subpoena from an expert w...
In a recent ruling by Elkaim AJ of the Supreme Court of New South Wales, Longton Legal achieved a favorable outcome in the case…
What can you subpoena from an expert witness? Do common law principles or the…
6531cdb41f44e
Young woman recovers more than $100,00...
It only took Longton Legal/Longton Compensation 10 month from the time of commencement of proceedings in the District Court of New South Wales to…
Young woman recovers more than $100,000 for botched breast augmentation surgery
6525e1b68e319
Melbourne woman recovers more than $33...
It only took Longton Legal/Longton Compensation Lawyers’ Yevgeni Shkuratov and Clare Decena 12 months from the time Sarah made her initial enquiry to her…
Melbourne woman recovers more than $330,000.00 for a botched cosmetic procedure in…
64115a5a5a485
Mother recovers significant compensati...
A small proportion of women who give birth vaginally will suffer 3rd or 4th degree tears. The risk of such tearing is increased with…
Mother recovers significant compensation for instrumental vaginal delivery injuries
655becd5e5418
What can you subpoena from an expert w...
In a recent ruling by Elkaim AJ of the Supreme Court of New South Wales, Longton Legal achieved a favorable outcome in the case…
What can you subpoena from an expert witness? Do common law principles or the…
6553fa9252784
Is calling a lawyer for a personal inj...
Calling a lawyer for any reason is a significant step that will cause anxiety about the unforeseen costs involved. In the not too distant…
Is calling a lawyer for a personal injury matter going to cost me money?
6531cdb41f44e
Young woman recovers more than $100,00...
It only took Longton Legal/Longton Compensation 10 month from the time of commencement of proceedings in the District Court of New South Wales to…
Young woman recovers more than $100,000 for botched breast augmentation surgery